Model United Nations conferences award delegates for outstanding performance, but the criteria judges use can vary widely. Understanding what the dais looks for is the first step toward winning Best Delegate or Outstanding Delegate. This article breaks down the core criteria across committees and provides actionable insights to help you stand out.
Research and Preparation
Judges expect delegates to demonstrate deep knowledge of their country’s policy, the committee agenda, and relevant global issues. According to the complete guide to Model United Nations, research forms the foundation of all other skills.
Country Policy and Stances
Delegates must accurately represent their assigned country’s position. This includes knowing voting records, past UN resolutions, and current diplomatic relationships. For example, a delegate representing China in a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) committee should be aware of China’s stance on the South China Sea and its veto history. Judges often check if a delegate’s statements align with the country’s actual foreign policy. For deeper insight, see Understanding Country Policy and Stances.
Committee and Agenda Knowledge
Understanding the committee’s mandate and the specific topics on the agenda is essential. A delegate in the World Health Organization (WHO) discussing pandemic preparedness should reference the WHO’s International Health Regulations (2005) and recent reforms. Use the country research template to organize your findings.
Use of Sources
Judges note whether delegates cite credible sources. Preferred sources include UN documents (e.g., UN General Assembly resolutions), government white papers, reports from reputable NGOs like Amnesty International, and academic journals. Avoid citing Wikipedia or biased news outlets. The article on finding reliable sources offers guidance on vetting information.
Speaking and Communication
Effective oral communication is a key criterion. Judges evaluate both formal speeches and informal interventions.
Formal Speeches
Speeches should be clear, concise, and persuasive. A typical formal speech lasts 60–90 seconds. Judges look for a strong opening hook, a clear policy statement, and a call to action. Avoid reading directly from notes; maintain eye contact with the dais and fellow delegates. Use hand gestures and vocal variety to convey conviction.
Informal Caucus Contributions
During moderated caucus, delegates must answer questions and make points on the fly. Judges assess how well delegates think on their feet, incorporate new information, and rebut opposing arguments. A delegate who consistently offers substantive input—rather than just repeating talking points—scores higher.
Language and Tone
Use formal, diplomatic language. Phrases like “my delegation believes” and “we urge the committee to” are appropriate. Avoid aggressive or confrontational tone; instead, frame disagreements as “different interpretations of the situation.”
Diplomacy and Collaboration
Model UN simulates real diplomacy, so judges reward delegates who build consensus and work with others.
Bloc Building
Effective delegates form blocs with like-minded countries. For example, in a United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) committee, a delegate representing Norway might ally with Sweden and Finland on climate financing. Judges observe how delegates approach others, negotiate, and compromise.
Leadership Without Dominating
Leadership is valued, but dominating the discussion is not. Judges look for delegates who guide the committee toward consensus, encourage quieter delegates to speak, and share credit for ideas. A delegate who writes a working paper but insists on sole authorship may be penalized.
Conflict Resolution
When disputes arise, judges note how delegates handle them. Skilled diplomats propose alternative wording, suggest moderated caucuses, or use unmoderated caucus to resolve differences. Avoid personal attacks; focus on the issue.
Resolution Writing and Substantive Contributions
In most committees, the final output is a resolution or directive. Judges assess both the process and the product.
Working Papers and Draft Resolutions
Delegates should contribute to drafting working papers. Judges look for clauses that are specific, actionable, and realistic. For example, a clause establishing a “Global Fund for Renewable Energy” should include a funding mechanism (e.g., a 0.01% levy on international currency transactions) and an implementing body (e.g., the International Renewable Energy Agency). Avoid vague language like “calls upon all states to cooperate.”
Amendments
Proposing thoughtful amendments that improve the resolution is a sign of engagement. Judges evaluate whether amendments are substantive (changing meaning) or cosmetic (changing wording). A delegate who successfully passes a key amendment gains credibility.
Voting Behavior
During voting bloc, delegates should vote consistently with their country’s policy. Judges may ask delegates to explain their vote. Abstaining without reason is frowned upon.
Position Papers and Pre-Conference Work
Many conferences require position papers due before the event. These are often scored separately and contribute to awards.
Structure and Content
A strong position paper includes: an introduction to the topic, your country’s policy, past actions, and proposed solutions. Follow the position paper structure and outline for guidance. Avoid simply listing facts; analyze and argue for your country’s stance.
Examples and Common Mistakes
Review position paper examples by committee to see what works. Common mistakes include writing too broadly, ignoring the committee’s mandate, and failing to cite sources. The article on common position paper mistakes can help you avoid pitfalls.
Crisis Committees and Specialized Bodies
Crisis committees have unique criteria. Judges evaluate how delegates respond to fast-changing scenarios and use directives.
Directives and Communiqués
In a crisis, delegates must write directives quickly. Judges look for clarity, feasibility, and strategic thinking. A directive that orders a military strike without considering consequences will be marked down. Use the crisis committee rules and procedures guide to understand the format.
Adaptability
Delegates who anticipate crises and propose preemptive measures impress judges. For example, if the committee is the United Nations Security Council and a crisis update announces a coup in a member state, a delegate who immediately calls for an emergency session and drafts a press statement shows initiative.
Portfolio Powers
In crisis committees with portfolio powers (e.g., a cabinet committee), judges evaluate how delegates use their specific powers. A defense minister should propose military options, while a finance minister should propose economic sanctions.
Overall Demeanor and Professionalism
Judges also consider intangible qualities throughout the conference.
Punctuality and Attendance
Arriving late, leaving early, or being absent without excuse harms a delegate’s chances. Judges note attendance. Missing a crucial vote or caucus can disqualify a delegate from awards.
Dress Code
Western business attire is standard. For men: suit and tie. For women: business suit or professional dress. Judges notice if a delegate looks sloppy or overly casual.
Respect for the Dais and Rules
Delegates must follow parliamentary procedure. Interrupting the dais, speaking out of turn, or ignoring the gavel are signs of disrespect. Conversely, delegates who assist the dais (e.g., by clarifying procedural points) are viewed positively.
Conclusion
Winning an award in Model UN requires a combination of preparation, skill, and deportment. By focusing on research, communication, diplomacy, substantive contributions, and professionalism, you can maximize your chances. Remember that judges are human—they appreciate delegates who are not only competent but also kind and collaborative. For more tips, read how to win Best Delegate and explore our other resources on choosing the right conference and budgeting for conferences.
Related articles
- The Complete Guide to Model United Nations
- How to Win Best Delegate
- Position Paper Structure and Outline
- Crisis Committee Rules and Procedures
- Top MUN Conferences for Beginners